This story continues at The Next Web
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
，详情可参考safew官方下载
// Send result back to the model，推荐阅读谷歌浏览器【最新下载地址】获取更多信息
Also Read: Top 10 AI Content Generator & Writer Tools in 2022，更多细节参见搜狗输入法2026
Последние новости